Which type of accreditation requires regular review to maintain status?

Interim accreditation is designed for organizations that need to demonstrate ongoing compliance with established standards before they can achieve full accreditation. This process typically involves routine evaluations and assessments to ensure that the institution or program continues to meet the required criteria on a regular basis.

The necessity for a regular review is a hallmark of interim accreditation, as it serves to continually assess and improve the organization's practices. This ensures that the entity does not only meet the standards at a specific point in time but remains compliant and responsible in its operations moving forward.

Full accreditation, while it may also require periodic reviews, does not typically involve the same level of ongoing assessment as interim accreditation, which focuses more on transitional compliance efforts. Type accreditation and major accreditation are not recognized standard terms within accreditation practices, making interim accreditation the most relevant option for this context.